In a matter of days, Norway, Denmark and Sweden expressed their intention to regulate or ban the circumcision of minors. After individual countries, the Nordic ombudspersons (Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland), joined by Greenland, agreed to work with their governments to achieve a ban of non-therapeutic circumcision of underage boys.
|Dorsal slit during neonate circumcision|
This was followed by the council of Europe voting and approving a resolution against practices that violate children's right to physical integrity (bodily integrity, genital autonomy), such as female genital mutilation, early surgery on intersex children, forced piercing and tattoos, and yes, circumcision of boys in lack of medical necessity.
|Infant circumcision (non-therapeutic)|
|Genital surgeries on intersex children|
|Underage tattoos on Coptic Christians|
|Piercings on non-consenting children|
|Female genital mutilation|
|Day of Ashura|
|Pharaonic circumcision, one of the worst forms of female genital mutilation|
Despite the committed legislative and policy measures which have been taken by Council of Europe member States to protect children from physical, sexual and mental violence, they continue to be harmed in many different contexts. One category is particularly worrisome, namely violations of the physical integrity of children which supporters tend to present as beneficial to the children themselves despite evidently negative life-long consequences in many cases: female genital mutilation, the circumcision of young boys for religious reasons, medical interventions during the early childhood of intersex children as well as the submission to or coercion of children into piercings, tattoos or plastic surgery.
The Parliamentary Assembly should urge member States to promote further awareness in their societies of the potential risks for children's physical and mental health of the above-mentioned procedures. Member States should take legislative and policy measures that help reinforce child protection in this context by giving primary consideration to the best interest of the child.
Council of Europe
I kept looking for press coverage of this resolution. The day before the debate some Jewish media reported on the upcoming vote. After the approval, there was a day of silence, followed by numerous articles in Jewish sites criticizing it for promoting racism and Antisemitism.
Some blogs, men rights groups, secular groups and atheist groups covered the topic.
The mainstream media remained silent on the topic.
One day later Reuters and Associated Press started reporting, but interesting enough, the articles were not about the resolution or about children's right to bodily integrity. The articles were about Israel criticizing an anti circumcision resolution by an European organization.
Could this be a strange coincidence? An oversight? Or is there somebody or some organizations interested in manipulating opinion to keep the impression of legitimacy over the genital cutting of boys?
For me this was incredibly enlightening how a biased media can manipulate people's opinions on different topics. I hope that aware readers will see behind the veil. The culture is changing and even attempts to conceal this do nothing but reveal the clues to those who keep their eyes wide open.
10 reasons German Socialists want Europe to ban circumcision of male children
"One day later Reuters and Associated Press started reporting, but interesting enough, the articles were not about the resolution or about children's right to bodily integrity. The articles were about Israel criticizing an anti circumcision resolution by an European organization."ReplyDelete
Interestingly, if I search for related articles in the German versions of google news (e.g., http://news.google.de), I am also able to find just a couple of articles about the topic itself, but the majority of articles published by major German journals like Spiegel, Zeit, etc. also report it only in the context of Israel's anger. Entering "Beschneidung" in the search bar of www.spiegel.de returns only two related articles: the one about Israel's response and the one about the Kenian mother denied the circumcision of her son.
European mass media might either be as biased as the American one or simply disinterested unless the government of a country has to complain about something. It seems that the mainstream mass media today is sensationalistic and recommendations about respecting human rights are simply overlooked.