Tuesday, September 17, 2013

City Council David Greenfield wants Mohelin to be able to suck babies penises without parental consent after circumcision

In any other instance, this outrageous action of sucking a newborn's penis would constitute sexual abuse. But cut the foreskin in a religious ceremony, and now you are free to do it, and you shouldn't even have to ask the baby's parents if they agree, even if you may be carrying the Herpes virus in your mouth.

Thank you New York City Council David Greenfield for further enabling religious freedom to be used as a excuse for Ritual Abuse of Minors.

Let's remember that this is not just a possibility. Just in April of this year 2 babies were reported to have contracted Herpes because of this ritual, and this infection that can be life threatening or permanently disabling for a newborn.

If this bill is enacted, every new baby infected with HPV by the means of Metzitzah b'Peh should know that this man is responsible for his tragedy.

City Council David Greenfield Metzitzah b'Peh (literally, "Oral Suction")

From The Jewish Week:

 “This is one of the most outrageous examples of government intruding into the ability of residents to freely practice their religion without restrictions based on questionable findings." said Greenfield, a Democrat, in his remarks, which were forwarded to the press.

"I continue to be outraged that the city took this incredibly misguided step last year, and will fight until the board reverses its decision or this bill becomes law. It is imperative that every citizen, regardless of their particular religion, be able to practice and worship without the fear of being restricted or targeted by their own government.”

Samantha Levine, deputy press secretary to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, said in an emailed response Tuesday that the city was acting to save lives.

“Health Department investigations of newborns with herpes virus between 2000–2013 have shown that 13 infants contracted the herpes virus when mohelim, or ritual circumcisers, placed their mouths directly on the child’s circumcision wound to draw blood away from the circumcision cut," Levine said.

"Two of these babies died. The city's highest obligation is to protect its children and it is critical for parents to know the risks associated with the practice.”

2 comments:

  1. Your religion is not your child's religion. They have a right to religious freedom just like you do. They haven't chosen a religion yet, so they have the right to not have yours carved into them. Hiding behind the guise of religion to do sick things to children is wrong and it needs to be stopped. I don't care what you're religion is, when you're hurting and sexually assaulting children, it needs to go.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To circleaks
    I am a south korea intactivist and manager of intactivism community.
    I am writing a book for circumcision and I referred to the literature from your site.
    I hope you recover your site as soon as possible.
    I want to talk with you about your site and circumcision. My email is nocirc@naver.com. I want you to sent email to me please and must communicate you.
    I always thank you so much...

    ReplyDelete